Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.
Building topical map: Starting…
Single transferable vote: History & Applications
The single transferable vote (STV) or proportional-ranked choice voting (P-RCV), also known as PR-STV and "proportional representation by means of the single transferable vote", is a multi-winner electoral system in which each voter casts a single vote in the form of a ranked ballot. Voters have the option to rank candidates, and their vote may be…
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.
More settings
Single transferable vote topic overview
The analysis highlights History and Applications as prominent areas in the source structure around Single transferable vote.
Related topics
145
Source areas
9
Connected nodes
154
Extracted relationships
68
Concept neighborhoods
59
Bridge connections
154
What this topic covers Research coverage
Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.
History · 50 topics
Overview · 46 topics
Issues · 19 topics
Related voting systems · 14 topics
Benefits · 5 topics
District magnitudes and proportionality · 4 topics
Use · 4 topics
Seat filling by quota · 2 topics
Flexibility · 1 topics
Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.
Key facts & relationships
High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.
Explore all related topics Closing gaps
A structured outline of related entities, concepts and subtopics. Open any item to build a new map centered on it.
Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.
Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.
How Single transferable vote connects Entity context
Entity context groups extracted connections by relationship type. Counts show recurrence in the analyzed source; the examples are research signals, not claims about importance.
The extracted context around Single transferable vote shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Single transferable vote → Although, Andrae, As Hare, At, British, Carl Andræ, Commons, Denmark, Hare, Hare's, House, In Hare's, Landsting, MP, MPs, PR, Rigsraad, STV, The, Thomas Hare Another extracted example is Single transferable vote → Assembly, Australian Democrats, Australian Greens, Australian Senate, Democratic Labor Party, From, House, In, Instant-runoff, Senators, STV, Tasmania, Tasmania Legislative Council, Tasmanian House, This. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.
Single transferable vote
Top relations
related to Origin· 23
Single transferable vote → Although, Andrae, As Hare, At, British, Carl Andræ, Commons, Denmark, Hare, Hare's, House, In Hare's, Landsting, MP, MPs, PR, Rigsraad, STV, The, Thomas Hare
related to Australia· 15
Single transferable vote → Assembly, Australian Democrats, Australian Greens, Australian Senate, Democratic Labor Party, From, House, In, Instant-runoff, Senators, STV, Tasmania, Tasmania Legislative Council, Tasmanian House, This
related to External links· 11
Single transferable vote → ABC Rear Vision, Accurate DemocracyAccurate Democracy, ACE ProjectA, Alaska, Australia's, Australia's Upper Houses, How, Maine, Ranked, STV, US House
related to Process· 5
Single transferable vote → Droop, Hare, In, STV, Surplus
Important terminology
Frequent words and multi-word phrases across the lead, headings, infobox and body. Useful for terminology coverage.
Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.
Single transferable vote relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples
Relationships are represented as Subject → Predicate → Object triples. Confidence describes extraction strength, not the real-world importance of a relationship; lower-confidence rows may be contextual rather than explicit.
TTTA extracted 68 structured relationships around Single transferable vote. Examples in this analysis include in the ticket voting system used in the US electoral college → instance of → but that still leaves the minority unrepresented.If the voters had been able to choose only one food to serve and city councils → instance of → In local government elections. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.
Subject
Predicate
Object
Confidence
Src
in the ticket voting system used in the US electoral college
instance of
but that still leaves the minority unrepresented.If the voters had been able to choose only one food to serve
0.80
text
city councils
instance of
In local government elections
0.80
text
STV elections are often held citywide with district magnitudes in the 6 to 13 range
instance of
In local government elections
0.80
text
or wards may be used
instance of
In local government elections
0.80
text
usually electing 2 to 5 members in each ward.If the Droop quota is used
instance of
In local government elections
0.80
text
for example
instance of
In local government elections
0.80
text
in a nine-seat district
instance of
In local government elections
0.80
text
the quota is 10 percent
instance of
In local government elections
0.80
text
the Democratic Labor Party
instance of
This change has led to the rise of a number of minor parties
0.80
text
Australian Democrats
instance of
This change has led to the rise of a number of minor parties
0.80
text
Australian Greens who have taken advantage of this system to achieve parliamentary representation
instance of
This change has led to the rise of a number of minor parties
0.80
text
the balance of power
instance of
This change has led to the rise of a number of minor parties
0.80
text
No triples extracted yet.
Related concept clusters Concept neighborhoods
Concept neighborhoods group terms that sit near one another in the extracted graph. They are useful for discovering adjacent language and context, but proximity does not by itself imply a factual relationship.
The concept neighborhoods around Single transferable vote bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Voting, Vote and Proportional. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.
Single transferable vote
Voting
Vote
Proportional
System
Representation
Also
Members
Preference
Votes
Transferred
Transfers
Electoral
single transferable vote
Voting
Vote
Proportional
System
Representation
First
Candidates
Also
Members
Preference
Votes
Transferred
proportional representation
Representation
Single
Voting
Systems
Stv
Vote
Voters
District
Members
System
Election
Use
electoral systems
Use
Systems
System
Votes
Single
Voting
Many
Members
Used
Quota
Stv
Method
largest remainders method
Used
Surplus
Systems
Votes
Proportional
Number
Vote
Use
Quota
Stv
Preferences
Transfers
electoral quota
Droop
Votes
Systems
System
Number
Seats
Single
Many
Voting
One
Surplus
Members
gregory method
Used
Surplus
Systems
Votes
Proportional
Number
Vote
Use
Quota
Stv
Preferences
Transfers
party-list proportional representation
Representation
Single
Voting
Systems
Stv
Vote
Voters
District
Members
System
Election
Use
Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges
Semantic bridges connect parts of the graph that would otherwise be more separate. A bridge is a structural signal in this analysis, not a claim that the two topic areas are equivalent.
For Single transferable vote, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Single transferable vote with History. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.
Number of nodes, edges, triples, density and central hubs. Use it to gauge the size and connectivity of the map.
Single transferable vote
Nodes155
Edges154
Triples68
Avg. degree1.99
Density0.012903
Components1
Source & methodology
TTTA analyzes the structure around Single transferable vote to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as History & Applications, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.
