Research any topic before you write.
Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.
Implicate order and explicate order are ontological concepts for quantum theory coined by theoretical physicist David Bohm during the early 1980s. They are used to describe two different frameworks for understanding the same phenomenon or aspect of reality. In particular, the concepts were developed in order to explain the bizarre behaviors of subatomic…
The analysis highlights Art and Regions as prominent areas in the source structure around Implicate and explicate order.
Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.
Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.
High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.
Explore different angles and find fresh ideas to shape your next piece of content.
Search suggestions related to this topic. Open a question to research it further; suggestions are not verified answers.
Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.
You can skip this section if you’re here for content ideas and keyword inspiration.
The extracted context around Implicate and explicate order shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Implicate and explicate order → Bohm, David Peat. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.
Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.
order bohm implicate explicate quantum theory within bohm's consciousness also whole matter reality relatively particles notion rather undivided new 1980
TTTA extracted 6 structured relationships around Implicate and explicate order. Examples in this analysis include scales → instance of → depending on contexts and atoms may represent continuous enfoldment → instance of → entities. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.
| Subject | Predicate | Object | Confidence | Src |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| scales | instance of | depending on contexts | 0.80 | text |
| atoms may represent continuous enfoldment | instance of | entities | 0.80 | text |
| unfoldment which manifests as a relatively stable | instance of | entities | 0.80 | text |
| autonomous entity that can be observed to follow a relatively well-defined path in spacetime | instance of | entities | 0.80 | text |
| Implicate and explicate order | related to overview | Bohm | 0.60 | section |
| Implicate and explicate order | related to overview | David Peat | 0.60 | section |
The concept neighborhoods around Implicate and explicate order bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Order, Explicate and Implicate. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.
For Implicate and explicate order, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Implicate and explicate order with Challenges to some generally prevailing views. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.
TTTA analyzes the structure around Implicate and explicate order to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as Art & Regions, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.
Source: Wikipedia — Implicate and explicate order · EN edition · Analysis: TopicsToTalkAbout