Research any topic before you write.

Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.

VoteHere: History, Companies & Products

VoteHere (also known as VoteHere.net and Dategrity) was an American voting software company based in Bellevue, Washington. Its founder, president and chief executive officer was Jim Adler. The company was recognized as one of the earliest developers of end-to-end (E2E) auditable voting systems.

Language: English [EN]
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.
100%
More settings
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

VoteHere topic overview

The analysis highlights History, Companies and Products as prominent areas in the source structure around VoteHere.

Related topics
34
Source areas
6
Connected nodes
40
Extracted relationships
43
Concept neighborhoods
14
Bridge connections
40

What this topic covers Research coverage

Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.

Controversies · 16 topics
History · 8 topics
Leadership · 4 topics
Overview · 3 topics
Funding · 2 topics
Products · 1 topics

Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.

Explore all related topics Closing gaps

Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.

Overview

History

Products

Funding

Leadership

Controversies

Advanced semantic analysis

Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.

How VoteHere connects Entity context

The extracted context around VoteHere shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, VoteHere → Aerospace, Alaska Republican, Arizona, By, California, England, For, In, May, Professional Engineering Employees, Republican National Convention, Society, Soundcode, Swindon, The, They, United States Another extracted example is VoteHere → Dan Spillane, General Accounting Office, He, In, In February, ITA, ITAs, November, Spillane, The, VoteHere's. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.

VoteHere

Top relations

related to history · 17
VoteHere → Aerospace, Alaska Republican, Arizona, By, California, England, For, In, May, Professional Engineering Employees, Republican National Convention, Society, Soundcode, Swindon, The, They, United States
related to Controversies · 11
VoteHere → Dan Spillane, General Accounting Office, He, In, In February, ITA, ITAs, November, Spillane, The, VoteHere's
related to Funding · 5
VoteHere → Cisco, Compaq, It, March, Northwest Venture Associates
related to Leadership · 5
VoteHere → Avi Rubin, Bill Owens, Ralph Munro, Robert Gates, The
related to Products · 5
VoteHere → In, Mail-in Ballot Tracker, MiBT, RemoteVote, VHTi

Important terminology

Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.

Important terminology

voting company online 2003 dategrity said systems harris also software code 2005 election state washington adler data security system elections

VoteHere relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples

TTTA extracted 43 structured relationships around VoteHere. Examples in this analysis include VoteHere → related to Controversies → VoteHere's and VoteHere → related to Controversies → In February. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.

SubjectPredicateObjectConfidenceSrc
VoteHererelated to ControversiesVoteHere's0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesIn February0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesDan Spillane0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesIn0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesSpillane0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesITAs0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesITA0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesGeneral Accounting Office0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesHe0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesThe0.60section
VoteHererelated to ControversiesNovember0.60section
VoteHererelated to FundingCisco0.60section

Related concept clusters Concept neighborhoods

The concept neighborhoods around VoteHere bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Company, Code and Software. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.

  • VoteHere
    • Company
    • Code
    • Software
    • Voting
    • Bellevue
    • Diebold
    • Source
    • Washington
    • State
    • Harris
    • Systems
    • Said
  • votehere
    • Company
    • Code
    • Software
    • Voting
    • Bellevue
    • Diebold
    • Source
    • Washington
    • State
    • Harris
    • Systems
    • Said
  • sequoia voting systems
    • Online
    • Systems
    • Voting
    • Said
    • Demoxi
    • Adler
    • Diebold
    • Lawsuit
    • Privacy
    • Washington
    • Code
    • Election
  • voting software
    • Online
    • Products
    • Company
    • Systems
    • Bellevue
    • Funding
    • Data
    • Demoxi
    • Security
    • Washington
    • Votehere
    • Released
  • bellevue, washington
    • State
    • Net
    • Year
    • Bellevue
    • Company
    • Washington
    • Ballot
    • Election
    • Law
    • Lawsuit
    • Mail-in
    • Privacy
  • diebold election systems
    • Harris
    • Said
    • Voting
    • Used
    • Year
    • Adler
    • Ballot
    • Diebold
    • Election
    • Including
    • Mail-in
    • Lawsuit
  • end-to-end (e2e) auditable voting
    • Online
    • Systems
    • Demoxi
    • Released
    • Year
    • Data
    • Elections
    • Including
    • Planned
    • Security
    • Source
    • System
  • advanced voting solutions
    • Online
    • Systems
    • Demoxi
    • Released
    • Year
    • Data
    • Elections
    • Including
    • Planned
    • Security
    • Source
    • System

Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges

For VoteHere, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects VoteHere with Controversies. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.

Min side: 3
VoteHere — Controversies · splits 24 ⟂ 17
VoteHere — History · splits 32 ⟂ 9
VoteHere — Leadership · splits 36 ⟂ 5
VoteHere — Overview · splits 37 ⟂ 4
VoteHere — Funding · splits 38 ⟂ 3

Map overview Semantic statistics

VoteHere

Nodes41
Edges40
Triples43
Avg. degree1.95
Density0.04878
Components1

Source & methodology

TTTA analyzes the structure around VoteHere to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as History, Companies & Products, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.

Source: Wikipedia — VoteHere · EN edition · Analysis: TopicsToTalkAbout

For writers, content strategists, SEOs, marketers and creators — from quick topic research to advanced semantic analysis.