Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.
Building topical map: Starting…
Stratfor: History, Companies & Products
Strategic Forecasting Inc. is an American strategic intelligence publishing company founded in 1996. Stratfor's business model is to provide individual and enterprise subscriptions to Stratfor Worldview, its online publication, and to perform intelligence gathering for corporate clients. The focus of Stratfor's content is security issues and analyzing…
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.
More settings
Stratfor topic overview
The analysis highlights History, Companies and Products as prominent areas in the source structure around Stratfor.
Related topics
32
Source areas
5
Connected nodes
37
Extracted relationships
107
Concept neighborhoods
17
Bridge connections
37
What this topic covers Research coverage
Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.
Structure and operations · 15 topics
Hack and publication of emails · 8 topics
History · 4 topics
Overview · 3 topics
Books · 2 topics
Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.
Key facts & relationships
High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.
Founded
1996 (1996)
Industry
Publishing
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, U.S.
Founder
George Friedman
Key people
Chip Harmon (Pres.) · Fred Burton (VP Intel, 2004–2020)
Number of employees
~100 (2016)
Explore all related topics Closing gaps
A structured outline of related entities, concepts and subtopics. Open any item to build a new map centered on it.
Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.
Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.
How Stratfor connects Entity context
Entity context groups extracted connections by relationship type. Counts show recurrence in the analyzed source; the examples are research signals, not claims about importance.
The extracted context around Stratfor shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Stratfor → America's, April, August, Being, David, Friedman, Geopolitical Intelligence, Geopolitical Weekly, George, Intelligence Failure, ISBN, May, Needs, New Generation Comes, New Worldview, October, On Stratfor, Political Journalism, Random House, Rorschach Test Another extracted example is Stratfor → An FBI, Anonymous, Bhopal, Dow Chemical, FBI, Hector Xavier Monsegur, In November, Jeremy Hammond, Leaked, May, Occupy Wall Street, On December, Sabu, Stratfor's, Their, WikiLeaks. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.
Stratfor
Top relations
related to Further reading· 26
Stratfor → America's, April, August, Being, David, Friedman, Geopolitical Intelligence, Geopolitical Weekly, George, Intelligence Failure, ISBN, May, Needs, New Generation Comes, New Worldview, October, On Stratfor, Political Journalism, Random House, Rorschach Test
related to Hack and publication of emails· 16
Stratfor → An FBI, Anonymous, Bhopal, Dow Chemical, FBI, Hector Xavier Monsegur, In November, Jeremy Hammond, Leaked, May, Occupy Wall Street, On December, Sabu, Stratfor's, Their, WikiLeaks
related to history· 16
Stratfor → August, Austin, Baker, Baton Rouge, Center, CGPS, Geopolitical Studies, George Friedman, It, Leonard Hochberg, Louisiana, Louisiana State University, Matthew, Strategic Forecasting, The, There
related to Structure and operations· 15
Stratfor → America, At, Austin, Bank, By, Coca-Cola Company, Dow Chemical Company, Goldman Sachs, Iraq, Lockheed Martin, Many, Media, Stratfor's, Texas, University
related to Books· 10
Stratfor → Age, Democratization, Kamran Bokhari, Middle East, Muslim, Political Islam, Reviewer Amani, Sehrawey, South Asian, Stratfor's
Key people· 2
Stratfor → Chip Harmon (Pres.), Fred Burton (VP Intel, 2004–2020)
Products· 2
Stratfor → Threat Lens, Worldview
related to Funding· 2
Stratfor → Dallas-based Teakwood Capital, In October
Founded· 1
Stratfor → 1996 (1996)
Founder· 1
Stratfor → George Friedman
Important terminology
Frequent words and multi-word phrases across the lead, headings, infobox and body. Useful for terminology coverage.
Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.
Relationships are represented as Subject → Predicate → Object triples. Confidence describes extraction strength, not the real-world importance of a relationship; lower-confidence rows may be contextual rather than explicit.
TTTA extracted 107 structured relationships around Stratfor. Examples in this analysis include Stratfor → Founded → 1996 (1996) and Stratfor → Founder → George Friedman. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.
Subject
Predicate
Object
Confidence
Src
Stratfor
Founded
1996 (1996)
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Founder
George Friedman
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Headquarters
Austin, Texas, U.S.
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Industry
Publishing
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Key people
Chip Harmon (Pres.)
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Key people
Fred Burton (VP Intel, 2004–2020)
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Number of employees
~100 (2016)
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Parent
Rane Corporation
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Products
Worldview
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Products
Threat Lens
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Revenue
~US$10M (2021 est.)
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Services
Advising
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Type
Private
1.00
infobox
Stratfor
Website
www.stratfor.com
1.00
infobox
No triples extracted yet.
Related concept clusters Concept neighborhoods
Concept neighborhoods group terms that sit near one another in the extracted graph. They are useful for discovering adjacent language and context, but proximity does not by itself imply a factual relationship.
The concept neighborhoods around Stratfor bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include George, Friedman and Clients. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.
Stratfor
George
Friedman
Clients
Texas
Worldview
Also
Geopolitical
Funding
Iraq
Founder
Information
May
stratfor
George
Friedman
Clients
Texas
Worldview
Also
Geopolitical
Funding
Iraq
Founder
Information
May
hack and publication of emails
Leaked
Wikileaks
Funding
Publishing
Stratfor's
Burton
Clients
Founder
Fred
Million
Texas
Worldview
austin
Employees
Founder
Texas
George
Friedman
Burton
Business
Chip
Fred
Funding
Harmon
Publishing
geopolitical
New
Website
Worldview
Friedman
Burton
Chip
Fred
Harmon
Strategic
Stratfor
Employees
May
geopolitical futures
New
Website
Worldview
Friedman
Burton
Chip
Fred
Harmon
Strategic
Stratfor
Employees
May
strategic intelligence
Publication
Worldview
Business
Publishing
Strategic
Stratfor's
Clients
Founded
May
Million
New
Political
intelligence gathering
Publication
Worldview
Business
Publishing
Strategic
Stratfor's
Clients
Founded
May
Million
New
Political
Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges
Semantic bridges connect parts of the graph that would otherwise be more separate. A bridge is a structural signal in this analysis, not a claim that the two topic areas are equivalent.
For Stratfor, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Stratfor with Structure and operations. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.
Number of nodes, edges, triples, density and central hubs. Use it to gauge the size and connectivity of the map.
Stratfor
Nodes38
Edges37
Triples107
Avg. degree1.95
Density0.052632
Components1
Source & methodology
TTTA analyzes the structure around Stratfor to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as History, Companies & Products, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.
