Schema.org

Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.

Map view:

Zoom: 100%

More settings

Connection length 100% Label size 100% Node size 100% Line width 100% Label width 100%

Export map as:

Schema.org topic overview

The analysis highlights History and Standards as prominent areas in the source structure around Schema.org.

Related topics: 32
Source areas: 4
Connected nodes: 36
Extracted relationships: 46
Related term clusters: 18
Bridge connections: 36

What this topic covers Research coverage

Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.

History · 22 topics

Overview · 6 topics

Schema types · 3 topics

Examples · 1 topics

Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.

Key facts & relationships

High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.

Abbreviation: schema
Base standards: URI, HTML5, RDF, Microdata, ISO 8601
Domain: Semantic Web
Latest version: 30.0; 25 March 2026
License: CC-BY-SA 3.0
Organization: Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Yandex

Start with your topic. Discover where to go next.

Explore different angles and find fresh ideas to shape your next piece of content.

Schema.org

6Structured data · Microdata (HTML) · RDFa

13Bing (search engine) · Google · Yahoo!

4Microformat · FOAF (software) · OpenCyc

Explore all related topics Closing gaps

Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.

For the semantics nerds

You can skip this section if you’re here for content ideas and keyword inspiration.

Advanced semantic analysis

How Schema.org connects Entity context

The extracted context around Schema.org shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Schema.org → Bing, FOAF, GoodRelations, Google, In November, JSON-LD, June, Microdata, Microformats, Much, OpenCyc, Public, RDFa, Russia, Schema, Semantic Web, September, W3C, Yahoo, Yandex Another extracted example is Schema.org → CSV, GitHub, Google, In June, JSON, Schema. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.

Top relations

related to history · 20

Schema.org → Bing, FOAF, GoodRelations, Google, In November, JSON-LD, June, Microdata, Microformats, Much, OpenCyc, Public, RDFa, Russia, Schema, Semantic Web, September, W3C, Yahoo, Yandex

related to Schema.org Usage Statistics · 6

Schema.org → CSV, GitHub, Google, In June, JSON, Schema

related to Schema types · 5

Schema.org → ArticleBreadcrumbCourseEventFAQLocalBusinessLogoMovieProductRecipeReviewVideoBookClipContactpointHowToOffer, Datatypes, June, Schema, Types

related to Microdata · 2

Schema.org → Schema, URL

Abbreviation · 1

Schema.org → schema

Base standards · 1

Schema.org → URI, HTML5, RDF, Microdata, ISO 8601

Domain · 1

Schema.org → Semantic Web

Latest version · 1

Schema.org → 30.0; 25 March 2026

License · 1

Schema.org → CC-BY-SA 3.0

Organization · 1

Schema.org → Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Yandex

Important terminology

Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.

Important terminology

schema org microdata using data web google json-ld search rdfa website yandex structured used types initiative usage statistics semantic schemas

Schema.org relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples

TTTA extracted 46 structured relationships around Schema.org. Examples in this analysis include Schema.org → Abbreviation → schema and Schema.org → Base standards → URI, HTML5, RDF, Microdata, ISO 8601. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.

Subject	Predicate	Object	Confidence	Src
Schema.org	Abbreviation	schema	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	Base standards	URI, HTML5, RDF, Microdata, ISO 8601	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	Domain	Semantic Web	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	Latest version	30.0; 25 March 2026	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	License	CC-BY-SA 3.0	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	Organization	Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Yandex	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	Related standards	RDFa, Microformat, RDFS, OWL, N-Triples, Turtle, JSON, JSON-LD, CSV	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	Website	schema.org	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	Year started	2011; 15 years ago (2011)	1.00	infobox
Schema.org	is a	reference website that publishes documentation and guidelines for using structured data mark-up on web-pages	0.90	text
Organization	instance of	Some schema markups	0.80	text
Person are commonly used to influence search results returned by Google's Knowledge Graph.The popularity of Schema.org has served for its use as a base for other schemas	instance of	Some schema markups	0.80	text

Related concept clusters Related term clusters

The concept neighborhoods around Schema.org bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Schema, Microdata and Using. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.

Schema.org
- Schema
- Microdata
- Using
- Website
- Rdfa
- Schemas
- Statistics
- Types
- Usage
- Json-ld
- Used
- Google
schema.org
- Schema
- Microdata
- Using
- Rdfa
- Schemas
- Statistics
- Usage
- Json-ld
- Website
- Google
- Formats
- Types
structured data
- Structured
- Google
- Bing
- Microformat
- Json-ld
- Used
- Microdata
- Search
- Markup
- Rich
- Schemas
- Yandex
microdata
- Rdfa
- Json-ld
- Schemas
- Yandex
- Structured
- Website
- Org
- Bing
- Examples
- Google
- Microformat
- Microsoft
rdfa
- Json-ld
- Microsoft
- Website
- Yandex
- Structured
- Google
- Bing
- Csv
- Examples
- Json
- Metadata
- Microformat
json-ld
- Rdfa
- Microdata
- Structured
- Website
- Microsoft
- Google
- Using
- Yandex
- Org
- Bing
- Csv
- Examples
bing
- Microformat
- Markup
- Schemas
- Yandex
- Structured
- Csv
- Google
- Json
- Microdata
- Microsoft
- Rich
- Data
google
- Structured
- Yandex
- Json-ld
- Bing
- Microdata
- Microformat
- Microsoft
- June
- Markup
- Rdfa
- Schemas
- Statistics

Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges

For Schema.org, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Schema.org with History. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.

Min side: 3

Schema.org — History · splits 14 ⟂ 23

Schema.org — Overview · splits 30 ⟂ 7

Schema.org — Schema types · splits 33 ⟂ 4

Map overview Semantic statistics

Schema.org

Nodes37

Edges36

Triples46

Avg. degree1.95

Density0.054054

Components1

Source & methodology

TTTA analyzes the structure around Schema.org to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as History & Standards, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.

Source: Wikipedia — Schema.org · EN edition · Analysis: TopicsToTalkAbout

Schema.org: History & Standards

Schema.org topic overview

What this topic covers Research coverage

Key facts & relationships

Start with your topic. Discover where to go next.

Questions to explore

Explore all related topics Closing gaps

Overview

History

Schema types

Examples

For the semantics nerds

Advanced semantic analysis

How Schema.org connects Entity context

Schema.org

Top relations

Important terminology

Important terminology

Schema.org relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples

Related concept clusters Related term clusters

Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges

Map overview Semantic statistics

Schema.org

Source & methodology