Research any topic before you write.

Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.

Schema.org: History & Standards

Schema.org is a reference website that publishes documentation and guidelines for using structured data mark-up on web-pages (in the form of microdata, RDFa or JSON-LD). Its main objective is to standardize HTML tags to be used by webmasters for creating rich results (displayed as visual data or infographic tables on search engine results) about a…

Language: English [EN]
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.
100%
More settings
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Schema.org topic overview

The analysis highlights History and Standards as prominent areas in the source structure around Schema.org.

Related topics
32
Source areas
4
Connected nodes
36
Extracted relationships
61
Concept neighborhoods
18
Bridge connections
36

What this topic covers Research coverage

Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.

History · 22 topics
Overview · 6 topics
Schema types · 3 topics
Examples · 1 topics

Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.

Key facts & relationships

High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.

Abbreviation
schema
Base standards
URI, HTML5, RDF, Microdata, ISO 8601
Domain
Semantic Web
Latest version
30.0; 25 March 2026
License
CC-BY-SA 3.0
Organization
Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Yandex

Explore all related topics Closing gaps

Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.

Overview

History

Schema types

Examples

Advanced semantic analysis

Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.

How Schema.org connects Entity context

The extracted context around Schema.org shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Schema.org → Bing, FOAF, GoodRelations, Google, In, In November, JSON-LD, June, Microdata, Microformats, Much, OpenCyc, Public, RDFa, Russia, Schema, Semantic Web, September, Such, The Another extracted example is Schema.org → CSV, GitHub, Google, In June, It, JSON, Schema, This, To. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.

Schema.org

Top relations

related to history · 24
Schema.org → Bing, FOAF, GoodRelations, Google, In, In November, JSON-LD, June, Microdata, Microformats, Much, OpenCyc, Public, RDFa, Russia, Schema, Semantic Web, September, Such, The
related to Schema.org Usage Statistics · 9
Schema.org → CSV, GitHub, Google, In June, It, JSON, Schema, This, To
related to Schema types · 7
Schema.org → ArticleBreadcrumbCourseEventFAQLocalBusinessLogoMovieProductRecipeReviewVideoBookClipContactpointHowToOffer, As, Datatypes, June, Schema, There, Types
related to External links · 4
Schema.org → GitHub, GitHubSchema, Official, Schema
related to Microdata · 4
Schema.org → In, Schema, The, URL
Abbreviation · 1
Schema.org → schema
Base standards · 1
Schema.org → URI, HTML5, RDF, Microdata, ISO 8601
Domain · 1
Schema.org → Semantic Web
Latest version · 1
Schema.org → 30.0; 25 March 2026
License · 1
Schema.org → CC-BY-SA 3.0

Important terminology

Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.

Important terminology

schema org microdata using data web google json-ld search rdfa website yandex structured used types initiative usage statistics semantic schemas

Schema.org relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples

TTTA extracted 61 structured relationships around Schema.org. Examples in this analysis include Schema.org → Abbreviation → schema and Schema.org → Base standards → URI, HTML5, RDF, Microdata, ISO 8601. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.

SubjectPredicateObjectConfidenceSrc
Schema.orgAbbreviationschema1.00infobox
Schema.orgBase standardsURI, HTML5, RDF, Microdata, ISO 86011.00infobox
Schema.orgDomainSemantic Web1.00infobox
Schema.orgLatest version30.0; 25 March 20261.00infobox
Schema.orgLicenseCC-BY-SA 3.01.00infobox
Schema.orgOrganizationGoogle, Yahoo!, Microsoft, Yandex1.00infobox
Schema.orgRelated standardsRDFa, Microformat, RDFS, OWL, N-Triples, Turtle, JSON, JSON-LD, CSV1.00infobox
Schema.orgWebsiteschema.org1.00infobox
Schema.orgYear started2011; 15 years ago (2011)1.00infobox
Schema.orgis areference website that publishes documentation and guidelines for using structured data mark-up on web-pages0.90text
Organizationinstance ofSome schema markups0.80text
Person are commonly used to influence search results returned by Google's Knowledge Graph.The popularity of Schema.org has served for its use as a base for other schemasinstance ofSome schema markups0.80text

Related concept clusters Concept neighborhoods

The concept neighborhoods around Schema.org bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Schema, Microdata and Using. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.

  • Schema.org
    • Schema
    • Microdata
    • Using
    • Website
    • Rdfa
    • Schemas
    • Statistics
    • Types
    • Usage
    • Json-ld
    • Used
    • Google
  • schema.org
    • Schema
    • Microdata
    • Using
    • Rdfa
    • Schemas
    • Statistics
    • Usage
    • Json-ld
    • Website
    • Google
    • Formats
    • Types
  • structured data
    • Structured
    • Google
    • Bing
    • Microformat
    • Json-ld
    • Used
    • Microdata
    • Search
    • Markup
    • Rich
    • Schemas
    • Yandex
  • microdata
    • Rdfa
    • Json-ld
    • Schemas
    • Yandex
    • Structured
    • Website
    • Org
    • Bing
    • Examples
    • Google
    • Microformat
    • Microsoft
  • rdfa
    • Json-ld
    • Microsoft
    • Website
    • Yandex
    • Structured
    • Google
    • Bing
    • Csv
    • Examples
    • Json
    • Metadata
    • Microformat
  • json-ld
    • Rdfa
    • Microdata
    • Structured
    • Website
    • Microsoft
    • Google
    • Using
    • Yandex
    • Org
    • Bing
    • Csv
    • Examples
  • bing
    • Microformat
    • Markup
    • Schemas
    • Yandex
    • Structured
    • Csv
    • Google
    • Json
    • Microdata
    • Microsoft
    • Rich
    • Data
  • google
    • Structured
    • Yandex
    • Json-ld
    • Bing
    • Microdata
    • Microformat
    • Microsoft
    • June
    • Markup
    • Rdfa
    • Schemas
    • Statistics

Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges

For Schema.org, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Schema.org with History. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.

Min side: 3
Schema.org — History · splits 14 ⟂ 23
Schema.org — Overview · splits 30 ⟂ 7
Schema.org — Schema types · splits 33 ⟂ 4

Map overview Semantic statistics

Schema.org

Nodes37
Edges36
Triples61
Avg. degree1.95
Density0.054054
Components1

Source & methodology

TTTA analyzes the structure around Schema.org to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as History & Standards, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.

Source: Wikipedia — Schema.org · EN edition · Analysis: TopicsToTalkAbout

For writers, content strategists, SEOs, marketers and creators — from quick topic research to advanced semantic analysis.