Research any topic before you write.

Find related topics.Discover entities.See connections.Build a topical map.

Input hypothesis

The input hypothesis, also known as the monitor model, is a group of five hypotheses of second-language acquisition developed by the linguist Stephen Krashen in the 1970s and 1980s. Krashen originally formulated the input hypothesis as just one of the five hypotheses, but over time the term has come to refer to the five hypotheses as a group. The…

[EN, English, English]

Applications & Products

Interactive map loads when it comes into view.
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.

Research this topic

Explore the main themes, entities and connections around Input hypothesis. Start with the topic map, then use the sections below for research and deeper semantic analysis.

Explore this topic

Start with a few of the strongest sections from the source topic. These are research directions, not a list of keywords you must use.

Acquisition-learning hypothesis

LinguisticsLanguageIntuitiveSubconsciousWritten
10 related topics

Reception and influence

Wolfgang ButzkammTerrellComprehension-basedMethodologyNatural approach
8 related topics

Applications in language teaching

TPR StorytellingStudy guide
2 related topics

Affective filter hypothesis

LearningEmotionalAffectiveHypothesisEducational psychology
5 related topics

Topics to explore

A structured outline of related entities, concepts and subtopics. Open any item to build a new map centered on it.

Browse the full topic structure. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.

Overview

Input hypothesis

Acquisition-learning hypothesis

Natural order hypothesis

Affective filter hypothesis

Reception and influence

Applications in language teaching

Advanced semantic analysis

Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.

Map overview Semantic statistics

Number of nodes, edges, triples, density and central hubs. Use it to gauge the size and connectivity of the map.

Input hypothesis

Nodes45
Edges44
Triples117
Avg. degree1.96
Density0.044444
Components1

How this topic connects Entity context

Quick relationship hints grouped by predicate. Useful for spotting recurring semantic connections around the current entity.

See the strongest relationship patterns around the current topic before diving into the raw triples.

Input hypothesis

Top relations

related to Further reading · 91
Input hypothesis → Academic Press, Against, An, Applied Linguistics, Archived, Cite, CiteSeerX, Classroom, Comprehensible Input, Department, Education, Ellis, English, English Language, ERIC ED503681, ERIC ED506178Lin, Erlbaum, Explicit Learning, Explorations, Heinemann
related to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input Hypothesis · 11
Input hypothesis → Brain, CI, Hypothesis, In, Recent, Since, SLA, Some, Stephen Krashen’s Comprehensible Input, These, This
related to Input hypothesis · 8
Input hypothesis → According, Comprehensible, Extra-linguistic, For, If, It, Krashen, The
related to overview · 4
Input hypothesis → At, Krashen, The, This
has application · 2
Input hypothesis → The, TPR Storytelling

Important terminology Word statistics

Frequent words and multi-word phrases across the lead, headings, infobox and body. Useful for terminology coverage.

Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.

Important terminology

language hypothesis input acquisition learning krashen comprehensible monitor natural affective hypotheses filter according second use order acquired teaching process acquire

Entity relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples

Extracted RDF-like relationships with confidence and source. The table includes structured facts and lower-confidence contextual relations.
SubjectPredicateObjectConfidenceSrc
fear or embarrassmentinstance ofThis states that learners' ability to acquire language is constrained if they are experiencing negative emotions0.80text
Input hypothesishas applicationThe0.60section
Input hypothesishas applicationTPR Storytelling0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisSince0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisStephen Krashen’s Comprehensible Input0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisCI0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisHypothesis0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisSLA0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisSome0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisRecent0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisBrain0.60section
Input hypothesisrelated to Critiques of the Comprehensible Input HypothesisIn0.60section

Related concept clusters Concept neighborhoods

Clusters of nearby vocabulary surrounding the topic. Scan them for adjacent concepts and language you may have missed.

These clusters group vocabulary that occurs around closely connected concepts in the source material.

    Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges

    Bridge nodes connect otherwise separate parts of the map. Expand a row to inspect the topic groups on each side.

    Bridges can reveal useful research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list of related terms.

    For writers, content strategists, SEOs, marketers and creators — from quick topic research to advanced semantic analysis.