Research any topic before you write.

Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.: Measurement, Reactions and aftermath & Patents at issue

Mayo v. Prometheus, 566 U.S. 66 (2012), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that unanimously held that claims directed to a method of giving a drug to a patient, measuring metabolites of that drug, and with a known threshold for efficacy in mind, deciding whether to increase or decrease the dosage of the drug, were not…

Language: English [EN]
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.
100%
More settings
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. topic overview

The analysis highlights Measurement, Reactions and aftermath and Patents at issue as prominent areas in the source structure around Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc..

Related topics
47
Source areas
7
Connected nodes
54
Extracted relationships
7
Related term clusters
22
Bridge connections
54

What this topic covers Research coverage

Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.

Reactions and aftermath · 18 topics
Overview · 9 topics
Patents at issue · 7 topics
Parties to the case · 4 topics
Remand and second Federal Circuit decision · 4 topics
The dispute · 3 topics
First Federal Circuit decision · 2 topics

Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.

Key facts & relationships

High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.

Argument
Oral argument
Citations
566 U.S. 66 (more)132 S. Ct. 1289; 182 L. Ed. 2d 321; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2316
Docket no.
10-1150
Full case name
Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
Majority
Breyer, joined by unanimous
Prior
Patent held invalid, 2008 WL 878910 (S.D. Cal.); reversed, 581 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2009); vacated and remanded in light of Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S.Ct. 3543 (2010); reversed ane…

Start with your topic. Discover where to go next.

Explore different angles and find fresh ideas to shape your next piece of content.

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
5Supreme Court of the United States · Certiorari · Bilski v. Kappos
7Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine · Thiopurine · Autoimmune disease
23Metabolite · Patent-eligible subject matter · Non-obviousness

Explore all related topics Closing gaps

Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.

Overview

Parties to the case

Patents at issue

The dispute

First Federal Circuit decision

Remand and second Federal Circuit decision

Reactions and aftermath

For the semantics nerds

You can skip this section if you’re here for content ideas and keyword inspiration.

Advanced semantic analysis

How Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. connects Entity context

The extracted context around Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → Oral argument Another extracted example is Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → 566 U.S. 66 (more)132 S. Ct. 1289; 182 L. Ed. 2d 321; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2316. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

Top relations

Argument · 1
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → Oral argument
Citations · 1
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → 566 U.S. 66 (more)132 S. Ct. 1289; 182 L. Ed. 2d 321; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2316
Docket no. · 1
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → 10-1150
Full case name · 1
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → Mayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
Majority · 1
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → Breyer, joined by unanimous
Prior · 1
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → Patent held invalid, 2008 WL 878910 (S.D. Cal.); reversed, 581 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2009); vacated and remanded in light of Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S.Ct. 3543 (2010); reversed ane…

Important terminology

Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.

Important terminology

court decision mayo patent supreme prometheus claims case law federal circuit subject matter court's patents medical steps new diagnostic 2012

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples

TTTA extracted 7 structured relationships around Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.. Examples in this analysis include Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → Argument → Oral argument and Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. → Citations → 566 U.S. 66 (more)132 S. Ct. 1289; 182 L. Ed. 2d 321; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 2316. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.

SubjectPredicateObjectConfidenceSrc
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.ArgumentOral argument1.00infobox
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Citations566 U.S. 66 (more)132 S. Ct. 1289; 182 L. Ed. 2d 321; 2012 U.S. LEXIS 23161.00infobox
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Docket no.10-11501.00infobox
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Full case nameMayo Collaborative Services, DBA Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al. v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.1.00infobox
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.MajorityBreyer, joined by unanimous1.00infobox
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.PriorPatent held invalid, 2008 WL 878910 (S.D. Cal.); reversed, 581 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2009); vacated and remanded in light of Bilski v. Kappos, 130 S.Ct. 3543 (2010); reversed ane…1.00infobox
O'Reilly vinstance ofthis commentator praised the decision for reaffirming earlier precedents0.80text

Related concept clusters Related term clusters

The concept neighborhoods around Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Subject, Supreme and Services. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.

  • Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
    • Subject
    • Supreme
    • Services
    • Medical
    • Patentable
    • Diagnostic
    • Laboratories
    • Mayo
    • Prometheus
    • Law
    • Circuit
    • Federal
  • mayo collaborative services v. prometheus laboratories, inc.
    • Services
    • Medical
    • Diagnostic
    • Prometheus
    • Subject
    • Supreme
    • Patentable
    • Patents
    • Laboratories
    • Mayo
    • Ruling
    • Law
  • patent-eligible subject matter
    • Matter
    • Subject
    • Patentable
    • Patent-eligible
    • Would
    • Mayo
    • Nature
    • New
    • Steps
    • Patent
    • Based
    • Method
  • mayo clinic
    • Subject
    • Supreme
    • Services
    • Medical
    • Patentable
    • Diagnostic
    • Laboratories
    • Prometheus
    • Law
    • Circuit
    • Federal
    • Patent
  • patentable subject matter
    • Matter
    • Subject
    • Patentable
    • Patent-eligible
    • Mayo
    • New
    • Steps
    • Supreme
    • Bilski
    • Patent
    • Based
    • Method
  • supreme court's ruling on the bilski case
    • Supreme
    • Bilski
    • Court's
    • Decision
    • Mayo
    • Court
    • Claim
    • Ruling
    • Method
    • New
    • Circuit
    • Federal
  • supreme court of the united states
    • Supreme
    • District
    • Circuit
    • Federal
    • Decision
    • Law
    • Mayo
    • Patent
    • Patentable
    • Found
    • Medical
    • Also
  • patent law
    • Nature
    • Natural
    • Medical
    • Patent
    • New
    • Diagnostic
    • Subject
    • Based
    • Medicine
    • Also
    • Patent-eligible
    • Claim

Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges

For Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. with Reactions and aftermath. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.

Min side: 3
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. — Reactions and aftermath · splits 36 ⟂ 19
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. — Overview · splits 45 ⟂ 10
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. — Patents at issue · splits 47 ⟂ 8
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. — Parties to the case · splits 50 ⟂ 5
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. — Remand and second Federal Circuit decision · splits 50 ⟂ 5
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. — The dispute · splits 51 ⟂ 4
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. — First Federal Circuit decision · splits 52 ⟂ 3

Map overview Semantic statistics

Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.

Nodes55
Edges54
Triples7
Avg. degree1.96
Density0.036364
Components1

Source & methodology

TTTA analyzes the structure around Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as Measurement, Reactions and aftermath & Patents at issue, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.

Source: Wikipedia — Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. · EN edition · Analysis: TopicsToTalkAbout

For writers, content strategists, SEOs, marketers and creators — from quick topic research to advanced semantic analysis.