Research any topic before you write.
Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.
In patent law, a kind code, or WIPO Standard ST.16 code, is a code used on patent documents published by intellectual property offices to distinguish different kinds of patent documents. A kind code includes a letter, and in many cases a number, used to distinguish the kind of patent document (e.g., publication of an application for a utility patent…
The analysis highlights Standards, In the European Patent Office and In Japan as prominent areas in the source structure around Kind code.
Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.
Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.
High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.
Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.
Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.
The extracted context around Kind code shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Kind code → A1, B1, In, January, The, Trademark Office, United States, United States Patent, USPTO Another extracted example is Kind code → A1, A2, EPO, European, Kind, The European Patent Office. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.
Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.
patent kind published application publication codes code documents b1 a1 european office include patents used distinguish number document us 654
TTTA extracted 24 structured relationships around Kind code. Examples in this analysis include the following → instance of → uses kind codes and Kind code → related to In Japan → The Japan Patent Office. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.
| Subject | Predicate | Object | Confidence | Src |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| the following | instance of | uses kind codes | 0.80 | text |
| Kind code | related to In Japan | The Japan Patent Office | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In Japan | JPO | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In Japan | B2 | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In the European Patent Office | The European Patent Office | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In the European Patent Office | EPO | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In the European Patent Office | Kind | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In the European Patent Office | A1 | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In the European Patent Office | European | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In the European Patent Office | A2 | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In the United States | In | 0.60 | section |
| Kind code | related to In the United States | United States | 0.60 | section |
The concept neighborhoods around Kind code bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Patent, Codes and Application. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.
For Kind code, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Kind code with Overview. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.
TTTA analyzes the structure around Kind code to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as Standards, In the European Patent Office & In Japan, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.
Source: Wikipedia — Kind code · EN edition · Analysis: TopicsToTalkAbout