Research any topic before you write.

Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.

Gray v. Perry: Art, Summary judgment & Background

Marcus Gray et al. v. Katy Perry et al. was a copyright infringement lawsuit against Katheryn Elizabeth Hudson ("Katy Perry"), Jordan Houston ("Juicy J"), Lukasz Gottwald ("Dr. Luke"), Karl Martin Sandberg ("Max Martin"), Henry Russell Walter ("Cirkut"), Capitol Records and others, in which the plaintiffs Marcus Gray ("Flame"), Emanuel Lambert ("Da'…

Language: English [EN]
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.
100%
More settings
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Gray v. Perry topic overview

The analysis highlights Art, Summary judgment and Background as prominent areas in the source structure around Gray v. Perry.

Related topics
61
Source areas
7
Connected nodes
68
Extracted relationships
7
Concept neighborhoods
14
Bridge connections
68

What this topic covers Research coverage

Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.

Overview · 24 topics
Summary judgment · 12 topics
Background · 11 topics
Motion for judgment as a matter of law · 6 topics
Aftermath and appeal · 4 topics
Jury trial · 3 topics
Conclusion · 1 topics

Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.

Key facts & relationships

High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.

Appealed to
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citations
2017 WL 1240740 (partial summary judgment granted) 2018 WL 3954008 (summary judgment denied) 2020 WL 1275221 (judgment as a matter of law granted, verdict vacated) 28 F.4th 87 (…
Court
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Decided
August 13, 2018 (summary judgment denied) July 29, 2019 (jury verdict) March 16, 2020 (judgment as a matter of law granted, verdict vacated)
Docket nos.
2:15-cv-05642
Full case name
Marcus Gray et. al. v. Katy Perry et. al

Explore all related topics Closing gaps

Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.

Overview

Background

Summary judgment

Jury trial

Motion for judgment as a matter of law

Conclusion

Aftermath and appeal

Advanced semantic analysis

Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.

How Gray v. Perry connects Entity context

The extracted context around Gray v. Perry shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Gray v. Perry → United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Another extracted example is Gray v. Perry → 2017 WL 1240740 (partial summary judgment granted) 2018 WL 3954008 (summary judgment denied) 2020 WL 1275221 (judgment as a matter of law granted, verdict vacated) 28 F.4th 87 (…. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.

Gray v. Perry

Top relations

Appealed to · 1
Gray v. Perry → United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Citations · 1
Gray v. Perry → 2017 WL 1240740 (partial summary judgment granted) 2018 WL 3954008 (summary judgment denied) 2020 WL 1275221 (judgment as a matter of law granted, verdict vacated) 28 F.4th 87 (…
Court · 1
Gray v. Perry → United States District Court for the Central District of California
Decided · 1
Gray v. Perry → August 13, 2018 (summary judgment denied) July 29, 2019 (jury verdict) March 16, 2020 (judgment as a matter of law granted, verdict vacated)
Docket nos. · 1
Gray v. Perry → 2:15-cv-05642
Full case name · 1
Gray v. Perry → Marcus Gray et. al. v. Katy Perry et. al
Judge sitting · 1
Gray v. Perry → Christina A. Snyder

Important terminology

Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.

Important terminology

joyful noise court dark horse ostinato defendants similarity plaintiffs jury evidence substantial et al perry song elements trial gray songs

Gray v. Perry relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples

TTTA extracted 7 structured relationships around Gray v. Perry. Examples in this analysis include Gray v. Perry → Appealed to → United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and Gray v. Perry → Citations → 2017 WL 1240740 (partial summary judgment granted) 2018 WL 3954008 (summary judgment denied) 2020 WL 1275221 (judgment as a matter of law granted, verdict vacated) 28 F.4th 87 (…. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.

SubjectPredicateObjectConfidenceSrc
Gray v. PerryAppealed toUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1.00infobox
Gray v. PerryCitations2017 WL 1240740 (partial summary judgment granted) 2018 WL 3954008 (summary judgment denied) 2020 WL 1275221 (judgment as a matter of law granted, verdict vacated) 28 F.4th 87 (…1.00infobox
Gray v. PerryCourtUnited States District Court for the Central District of California1.00infobox
Gray v. PerryDecidedAugust 13, 2018 (summary judgment denied) July 29, 2019 (jury verdict) March 16, 2020 (judgment as a matter of law granted, verdict vacated)1.00infobox
Gray v. PerryDocket nos.2:15-cv-056421.00infobox
Gray v. PerryFull case nameMarcus Gray et. al. v. Katy Perry et. al1.00infobox
Gray v. PerryJudge sittingChristina A. Snyder1.00infobox

Related concept clusters Concept neighborhoods

The concept neighborhoods around Gray v. Perry bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Extrinsic, Judgment and Matter. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.

  • Gray v. Perry
    • Extrinsic
    • Judgment
    • Matter
    • Law
    • Since
    • Test
    • Substantial
    • Access
    • Protectable
    • Jury
    • Similarity
    • Songs
  • gray v. perry
    • Extrinsic
    • Judgment
    • Matter
    • Law
    • Since
    • Test
    • Substantial
    • Access
    • Protectable
    • Jury
    • Similarity
    • Plaintiffs
  • marcus gray
    • Extrinsic
    • Judgment
    • Matter
    • Law
    • Test
    • Substantial
    • Access
    • Protectable
    • Jury
    • Similarity
    • Court
    • Elements
  • dark horse
    • Horse
    • Joyful
    • Noise
    • Ostinato
    • Plaintiffs
    • Song
    • Finding
    • Records
    • Profits
    • Jury's
    • Evidence
    • Similarity
  • ostinato
    • Ostinatos
    • Beat
    • Court
    • Protectable
    • Musical
    • Evidence
    • Songs
    • Defendants
    • Jury
    • Defendants'
    • Extrinsic
    • Test
  • jury trial
    • Evidence
    • Profits
    • Jury
    • Trial
    • Defendants
    • Test
    • Jury's
    • Court
    • Defendants'
    • Access
    • Similarity
    • Judgment
  • judgment as a matter of law
    • Law
    • Matter
    • Defendants'
    • Test
    • Similarity
    • Court
    • Defendants
    • Substantial
    • Since
    • Jury's
    • Trial
    • Jury
  • circumstantial evidence
    • Trial
    • Jury's
    • Jury
    • Plaintiffs
    • Profits
    • Finding
    • Horse
    • Joyful
    • Noise
    • Substantial
    • Ostinato
    • Judgment

Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges

For Gray v. Perry, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Gray v. Perry with Overview. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.

Min side: 3
Gray v. Perry — Overview · splits 44 ⟂ 25
Gray v. Perry — Summary judgment · splits 56 ⟂ 13
Gray v. Perry — Background · splits 57 ⟂ 12
Gray v. Perry — Motion for judgment as a matter of law · splits 62 ⟂ 7
Gray v. Perry — Aftermath and appeal · splits 64 ⟂ 5
Gray v. Perry — Jury trial · splits 65 ⟂ 4

Map overview Semantic statistics

Gray v. Perry

Nodes69
Edges68
Triples7
Avg. degree1.97
Density0.028986
Components1

Source & methodology

TTTA analyzes the structure around Gray v. Perry to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as Art, Summary judgment & Background, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.

Source: Wikipedia — Gray v. Perry · EN edition · Analysis: TopicsToTalkAbout

For writers, content strategists, SEOs, marketers and creators — from quick topic research to advanced semantic analysis.