Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.
Building topical map: Starting…
Criminalization: Principles, The problems & Ontological basis of crime
Criminalization or criminalisation, in criminology, is "the process by which behaviors and individuals are transformed into crime and criminals". Previously legal acts may be transformed into crimes by legislation or judicial decision. However, there is usually a formal presumption in the rules of statutory interpretation against retrospective…
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.
More settings
Criminalization topic overview
The analysis highlights Principles, The problems and Ontological basis of crime as prominent areas in the source structure around Criminalization.
Related topics
72
Source areas
4
Connected nodes
76
Extracted relationships
182
Concept neighborhoods
16
Bridge connections
76
What this topic covers Research coverage
Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.
Principles · 51 topics
The problems · 12 topics
Overview · 5 topics
Ontological basis of crime · 4 topics
Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.
Key facts & relationships
High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.
Explore all related topics Closing gaps
A structured outline of related entities, concepts and subtopics. Open any item to build a new map centered on it.
Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.
Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.
How Criminalization connects Entity context
Entity context groups extracted connections by relationship type. Counts show recurrence in the analyzed source; the examples are research signals, not claims about importance.
The extracted context around Criminalization shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Criminalization → Abuse, Acta Criminologica, American Experience, Amster, An Introduction, Ashgate, Australian Journal, Baker, Boulder, CO, Consent, Constitutionalizing, Cowell, Crime, Crime Contradictions, Crime Control, Crime Coverage, Crime Victims, Crime Wars Forgotten, Criminal Justice Another extracted example is Criminalization → Agreement, As, Certain, Devlin, Devlin's, However, Human Rights, If, In, Joseph Raz, Lying, Other, Patrick Devlin, Such, The, The European Convention, There, This. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.
Criminalization → Agreement, As, Certain, Devlin, Devlin's, However, Human Rights, If, In, Joseph Raz, Lying, Other, Patrick Devlin, Such, The, The European Convention, There, This
related to The problems· 12
Criminalization → But, For, Garkawe, Historically, Hudud, In, Islamic, Left Realism, Right Realism, The, There, Zina
related to Principles· 9
Criminalization → Having, In, It, Most, Several, The, These, Those, Under
related to Procedure· 7
Criminalization → Crime, It, Moreover, Such, The, There, When
see also· 3
Criminalization → Crime, Number, United States
Important terminology
Frequent words and multi-word phrases across the lead, headings, infobox and body. Useful for terminology coverage.
Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.
Relationships are represented as Subject → Predicate → Object triples. Confidence describes extraction strength, not the real-world importance of a relationship; lower-confidence rows may be contextual rather than explicit.
TTTA extracted 182 structured relationships around Criminalization. Examples in this analysis include decriminalization → instance of → advocates that crime policies and war or from the personal violence in a robbery → instance of → others by violence which might stem from a major conflict. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.
Subject
Predicate
Object
Confidence
Src
decriminalization
instance of
advocates that crime policies
0.80
text
depenalisation or diversion
instance of
advocates that crime policies
0.80
text
and mediation should be adopted wherever possible
instance of
advocates that crime policies
0.80
text
war or from the personal violence in a robbery
instance of
others by violence which might stem from a major conflict
0.80
text
homosexuality
instance of
views were likely to vary widely on issues
0.80
text
contraception
instance of
views were likely to vary widely on issues
0.80
text
other matters
instance of
views were likely to vary widely on issues
0.80
text
particularly those influenced by religion
instance of
views were likely to vary widely on issues
0.80
text
Feinberg struggle to quantify the ideology behind the illegality of acts which in another setting would be acceptable
instance of
Philosophers
0.80
text
driving
instance of
in matters of social security or some personal regulated activity
0.80
text
Feinburg point out
instance of
theorists
0.80
text
legislatures
instance of
This is changing the character and content of the remaining institutions of the state which must now work co-operatively with other for-profit agencies.The political order must…
0.80
text
No triples extracted yet.
Related concept clusters Concept neighborhoods
Concept neighborhoods group terms that sit near one another in the extracted graph. They are useful for discovering adjacent language and context, but proximity does not by itself imply a factual relationship.
The concept neighborhoods around Criminalization bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Process, May and Laws. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.
crime
Control
Criminology
Criminal
See
Isbn
Political
Harm
Justice
Criminalization
Also
Ontology
Society
ontological basis of crime
Control
Criminology
Criminal
See
Isbn
Political
Harm
Justice
Criminalization
Also
Ontology
Society
Criminalization
Process
May
Laws
Principle
Criminal
Justice
Crime
Also
Control
Criminology
System
Acts
criminalization
Process
May
Laws
Principle
Criminal
Justice
Crime
Also
Control
Criminology
System
Acts
sharia law
New
Baker
Criminal
Dennis
Moral
Others
Would
Also
Order
Public
Rights
Society
british law
New
Baker
Criminal
Dennis
Moral
Others
Would
Also
Order
Public
Rights
Society
common law
New
Baker
Criminal
Dennis
Moral
Others
Would
Also
Order
Public
Rights
Society
retrospective application of laws
May
Also
Many
Autonomy
Criminal
Others
General
Legal
Would
Social
Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges
Semantic bridges connect parts of the graph that would otherwise be more separate. A bridge is a structural signal in this analysis, not a claim that the two topic areas are equivalent.
For Criminalization, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Criminalization with Principles. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.
Number of nodes, edges, triples, density and central hubs. Use it to gauge the size and connectivity of the map.
Criminalization
Nodes77
Edges76
Triples182
Avg. degree1.97
Density0.025974
Components1
Source & methodology
TTTA analyzes the structure around Criminalization to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as Principles, The problems & Ontological basis of crime, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.
