Research any topic before you write.

Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.

Active–stative alignment: Occurrence, Argument marking & Overview

In linguistic typology, active–stative alignment (also split intransitive alignment or semantic alignment) is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the sole argument ("subject") of an intransitive clause (often symbolized as S) is sometimes marked in the same way as an agent of a transitive verb (that is, like a subject such as "I" or "she" in…

Language: English [EN]
Use the mouse wheel or two fingers (on touchscreens) to zoom in and out of the map.
100%
More settings
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Active–stative alignment topic overview

The analysis highlights Occurrence, Argument marking and Overview as prominent areas in the source structure around Active–stative alignment.

Related topics
118
Source areas
4
Connected nodes
122
Extracted relationships
10
Concept neighborhoods
35
Bridge connections
122

What this topic covers Research coverage

Source areas are shown by the number of related topics found in each part of the analysis. Use smaller areas too: they can reveal specialized angles and content gaps.

Occurrence · 97 topics
Overview · 14 topics
Argument marking · 6 topics
Types · 1 topics

Smaller areas are not necessarily less important. They contain fewer connections in this analysis and can be useful for finding specialized angles or coverage gaps.

Explore all related topics Closing gaps

Browse the complete topic structure, not only the most central items. Less prominent entities and concepts can reveal missing angles, specialized context and useful research gaps. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.

Overview

Types

Argument marking

Occurrence

Advanced semantic analysis

Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.

How Active–stative alignment connects Entity context

The extracted context around Active–stative alignment shows recurring relationship patterns in the source. For example, Active–stative alignment → Active, Also, The, Thus. Use these groups to spot repeated connection types before inspecting the individual relationships.

Active–stative alignment

Top relations

related to Terminology · 4
Active–stative alignment → Active, Also, The, Thus

Important terminology

Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.

Important terminology

languages active case verb argument language stative intransitive alignment doi isbn patientive agentive 10 marking marked ergative subject semantic verbs

Active–stative alignment relationships Subject–Predicate–Object triples

TTTA extracted 10 structured relationships around Active–stative alignment. Examples in this analysis include English that generally align S as S → instance of → stative languages contrast with accusative languages and to run are marked like transitive agents → instance of → arguments of active verbs. The table shows each extracted connection, where it came from and its confidence.

SubjectPredicateObjectConfidenceSrc
English that generally align S as Sinstance ofstative languages contrast with accusative languages0.80text
to run are marked like transitive agentsinstance ofarguments of active verbs0.80text
as in accusative languagesinstance ofarguments of active verbs0.80text
and arguments of inactive verbs such as to stand are marked like transitive objectsinstance ofarguments of active verbs0.80text
as in ergative languagesinstance ofarguments of active verbs0.80text
Chickasawinstance ofA subgroup of Muskogean languages0.80text
Active–stative alignmentrelated to TerminologyActive0.60section
Active–stative alignmentrelated to TerminologyAlso0.60section
Active–stative alignmentrelated to TerminologyThus0.60section
Active–stative alignmentrelated to TerminologyThe0.60section

Related concept clusters Concept neighborhoods

The concept neighborhoods around Active–stative alignment bring nearby vocabulary together. In this analysis, examples include Stative, Languages and Alignment. Use the clusters to find adjacent concepts and terminology that may deserve separate research.

  • Active–stative alignment
    • Stative
    • Languages
    • Alignment
    • Ergative
    • Accusative
    • Language
    • Type
    • Also
    • Like
    • Marking
    • Often
    • Split
  • active–stative alignment
    • Stative
    • Languages
    • Alignment
    • Also
    • Semantic
    • Ergative
    • Often
    • Accusative
    • Language
    • Verb
    • English
    • Type
  • morphosyntactic alignment
    • Also
    • Stative
    • Semantic
    • Often
    • Language
    • Verb
    • Languages
    • Type
    • Accusative
    • Split
    • Typology
    • Used
  • argument
    • Intransitive
    • Patientive
    • Agentive
    • Verb
    • Subject
    • Marked
    • Semantic
    • Verbs
    • English
    • Example
    • Often
    • Split
  • accusative languages
    • Ergative
    • Split
    • Used
    • Active
    • Like
    • Marking
    • Verbs
    • Stative
    • Case
    • Accusative
    • Languages
    • Alignment
  • ergative languages
    • Types
    • Ergative
    • Languages
    • Marking
    • Split
    • Used
    • Like
    • Stative
    • Case
    • Verbs
    • Accusative
    • Often
  • northern jê languages
    • Ergative
    • Marking
    • Stative
    • Case
    • Accusative
    • Verbs
    • Types
    • Often
    • Split
    • Verb
    • Semantic
    • Patientive
  • tupi–guarani languages
    • Ergative
    • Marking
    • Stative
    • Case
    • Accusative
    • Verbs
    • Types
    • Often
    • Split
    • Verb
    • Semantic
    • Patientive

Connections between topic areas Semantic bridges

For Active–stative alignment, one of the stronger structural bridges in this analysis connects Active–stative alignment with Occurrence. Bridges highlight paths between different parts of the map and can reveal research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list.

Min side: 3
Active–stative alignment — Occurrence · splits 25 ⟂ 98
Active–stative alignment — Overview · splits 108 ⟂ 15
Active–stative alignment — Argument marking · splits 116 ⟂ 7

Map overview Semantic statistics

Active–stative alignment

Nodes123
Edges122
Triples10
Avg. degree1.98
Density0.01626
Components1

Source & methodology

TTTA analyzes the structure around Active–stative alignment to surface related topics, entities, relationships, concept neighborhoods and bridge connections. Use the map to explore areas such as Occurrence, Argument marking & Overview, including less central topics that may reveal useful research gaps. Automatically extracted connections are research leads rather than rewritten encyclopedia content.

Source: Wikipedia — Active–stative alignment · EN edition · Analysis: TopicsToTalkAbout

For writers, content strategists, SEOs, marketers and creators — from quick topic research to advanced semantic analysis.