Research any topic before you write.
Find related topics. | Discover entities. | See connections. | Build a topical map.
In linguistic typology, active–stative alignment (also split intransitive alignment or semantic alignment) is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the sole argument ("subject") of an intransitive clause (often symbolized as S) is sometimes marked in the same way as an agent of a transitive verb (that is, like a subject such as "I" or "she" in…
Occurrence, Argument marking & Overview
Explore the main themes, entities and connections around Active–stative alignment. Start with the topic map, then use the sections below for research and deeper semantic analysis.
Start with a few of the strongest sections from the source topic. These are research directions, not a list of keywords you must use.
High-confidence facts extracted from structured source data. Use them as anchors for further research.
Browse the full topic structure. Each item opens a new analysis centered on that subject.
Deeper signals for content research, entity SEO and topical coverage. The plain-language headings explain what each technical view is useful for.
See the strongest relationship patterns around the current topic before diving into the raw triples.
Use these terms to understand the vocabulary surrounding the topic, not as a checklist for keyword stuffing.
languages active case verb argument language stative intransitive alignment doi isbn patientive agentive 10 marking marked ergative subject semantic verbs
| Subject | Predicate | Object | Confidence | Src |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| English that generally align S as S | instance of | stative languages contrast with accusative languages | 0.80 | text |
| to run are marked like transitive agents | instance of | arguments of active verbs | 0.80 | text |
| as in accusative languages | instance of | arguments of active verbs | 0.80 | text |
| and arguments of inactive verbs such as to stand are marked like transitive objects | instance of | arguments of active verbs | 0.80 | text |
| as in ergative languages | instance of | arguments of active verbs | 0.80 | text |
| Chickasaw | instance of | A subgroup of Muskogean languages | 0.80 | text |
| Active–stative alignment | related to Terminology | Active | 0.60 | section |
| Active–stative alignment | related to Terminology | Also | 0.60 | section |
| Active–stative alignment | related to Terminology | Thus | 0.60 | section |
| Active–stative alignment | related to Terminology | The | 0.60 | section |
These clusters group vocabulary that occurs around closely connected concepts in the source material.
Bridges can reveal useful research angles that are easy to miss in a flat list of related terms.